ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY OF MINING COMPANIES IN THE ARCTIC
https://doi.org/10.25587/SVFU.2022.30.74.001
Abstract
The article deals with the environmental policies of large mining companies operating in the Russian Arctic. The introduction of mandatory requirements for the submission of environmental reporting is directly related to corporate social responsibility, which cannot be ignored by mining companies that calculate the risks associated with the negative impact of industry on the environment and take into account the interests of stakeholders in the Arctic. Inconsistency of the norms and legislation on subsoil with the norms of land, water, forest and faunistic legislation, as well as with the environmental safety norms, contradictory law enforcement practice make the topic of this article relevant and needed. It is necessary to develop a unified concept of environmental protection and environmental safety on the use of subsoil at the state level, which would provide for an optimal combination of social, economic and environmental interests. In this article, based on the adopted strategic documents and established practice in Russia and the world, we will talk about taking into account the environmental factor in the development of deposits in the Arctic, concluding agreements with residents of the Arctic zone, and applying the liability standard by subsoil users. At the same time, at present, for the majority of mining companies in Russia, the submission of social, environmental and sustainable development reports, information on the company’s strategy in the field of ethical business conduct, taking into account the opinions of stakeholders, is not provided for by law.
Keywords
About the Author
Tatyana Spartakovna IvanovaRussian Federation
Ivanova, Tatyana Spartakovna – Doctor of Law Sciences, Professor of the Department of Arctic Law and Law of the Asia-Pacific Region
Yakutsk
References
1. Analytical review of corporate non-financial reports: 2017–2018 issue / E. N. Feoktistova, L. V. Alenicheva, G. A. Kopylova [and others]. – Moscow : RSPP, 2019. – 104 p.
2. GOST R ISO 26000-2012. Social Responsibility Guide. – URL: https://standartgost.ru/g/%D0%93%D0%9E%D0%A1%D0%A2_%D0%A0_%D0%98%D0%A1%D0%9E_26000-2012 (date of access: 09/09/2022).
3. DR Congo seeks compensation for a mine accident from Catoca. This is a joint venture between Alrosa and Endiama. – URL: https://www.bfm.ru/news/480686 (accessed: 09/09/2022).
4. Dyadik, N. V. Business and power: environmental and economic responsibility in the Russian Arctic / N. V. Dyadik, A. N. Chapargin // Arctic and North. – 2020. – No. 41. – P. 38–61. – DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.41.38.
5. Key indicators: official website of PJSC ALROSA. – URL: https://alrosa.ru/about/key-indicators/ (accessed: 09/09/2022).
6. National Register of corporate non-financial reports. – URL: https://www.rspp.ru/activity/social/registr/ (accessed: 09.09.2022).
7. Our assets: official website of PAO NOVATEK. – URL: https://www.novatek.ru/ru/business/assets/ (accessed: 09/09/2022).
8. Main provisions of the environmental and social responsibility policy of mining companies. – URL: https://wwf.ru/resources/publications/booklets/basic-principles-for-environmentally-and-socially-responsible-policy-ofmining-companies/ (accessed: 09/09/2022).
9. Reporting of PJSC Gazprom for 2020. – URL: https://www.gazprom.ru/investors/disclosure/reports/2020/ (accessed: 09.09.2022).
10. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 05.05.2017 No. 876-r «On approval of the Concept for the development of public non-financial reporting and an action plan for its implementation» // SZ RF. – May 22, 2017. – N 21. – Article 3037.
11. Openness rating of Russian oil and gas companies in the field of environmental responsibility. – Moscow : WWF Russia, 2019
12. Decision of the Arbitration Court of the Krasnoyarsk Territory dated February 12, 2021. – URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/4490905b-aec9-472ea30a-c384e1679527 (accessed: 09/09/2022).
13. Rosprirodnadzor revealed numerous violations in the activities of JSC Norilsk-Taimyr Energy Company. – URL: https://rpn.gov.ru/newsrosprirodnadzor_vyyavil_mnogochislennye_narusheniya_v_deyatelnosti_ao_norilsko_taymyrskaya_energetich/ (accessed: 09.09.2022).
14. The Board of Directors of PAO NOVATEK at its meeting on August 25, 2020 approved the environmental and climate goals of the Company for the period up to 2030: official website of PAO NOVATEK. – URL: https://www.novatek.ru/ru/esg/strategy/targets/ (accessed: 09/09/2022).
15. Joint environmental requirements of public environmental organizations for oil and gas companies. – URL: https://wwf.ru/upload/iblock/4ac/oil_demands.pdf (accessed: 09/09/2022).
16. Table of the Library of corporate non-financial reports. – URL: https://rspp.ru/tables/non-financial-reports-library/ (accessed: 09/09/2022).
17. Federal Law of July 13, 2020 N 193-FZ «On State Support for Entrepreneurial Activities in the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation» // Rossiyskaya Gazeta. – 2020. – July 16. – N 155.
18. Yakutia estimated its damage from the breach of ALROSA dams at 27 billion rubles. – URL: https://www.rbc.ru/politics/31/10/2018/5bd952c89a7947ebf926f44d (accessed: 09/09/2022).
19. Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug. – URL: https://lukoil.ru/Company/BusinessOperation/GeographicReach/Russia/yamalonenetsautonomousokrug (accessed: 09/09/2022).
20. Buisine O 2021 RSE et comptabilité environnementale // Bulletin Joly Sociétés. – September 59.
21. Buslaev, G. Ensuring the sustainability of Arctic industrial facilities under conditions of global climate change / G. Buslaev, P. Tsvetkov, A. Lavrik // Resources. – 2021. – Issue 21100808642, Vol. 10. – DOI: 10.3390/resources10120128.
22. Cherepovitsyn, A. E. Critical analysis of methodological approaches to assessing the sustainability of Arctic oil and gas projects / A. E. Cherepovitsyn, P. S. Tsvetkov, O. O. Evseeva [and others] // Journal of the Mining Institute. – 2021. – No. 24113336, Vol. 1, p. 249. – P. 463–478. – DOI: 10.31897/PMI.2021.3.15.
23. Krasyukova, E. A rational approach to the management of underground mining in complex hydrogeological and geomechanical conditions based on a risk assessment / E. Krasyukova, I. Aynbinder, A. Ivannikov // IOP Conf. – Series: Earth and Environmental Science 684 012006, 2021. – DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/684/1/012006.
24. Ilinova, A. Scenario-based forecasting of Russian Arctic energy shelf development / A. Ilinova, V. Solovyova, S. Yudin // Energy Reports ; Buisine O 2021 RSE et comptabilité environnementale Bulletin Joly Sociétés Septembre 59, 2020. – Issue 21100389511, Vol. 6. – P. 1349–1355. – DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.022
25. Litvinenko, V. S. Barriers to the implementation of hydrogen initiatives in the context of sustainable development of the world energy industry Journal of the Mining Institute / V. S. Litvinenko, P. S. Tsvetkov, M. V. Dvoinikov, G. V. Buslaev. – 2020. – No. 244. – P. 421–431. – URL: http://pmi.spmi.ru/index.php/pmi/article/view/13699.
26. Litvinenko, V. S. The social and market mechanism of sustainable development of public companies in the mineral resource sector / V. S. Litvinenko, P. S. Tsvetkov, K. V. Molodtsov // Eurasian Mining (Business and International Management). – 2020. – No 1. – P. 36–41. – URL: http://www.rudmet.ru/journal/1924/article/32600/?language=en.
27. Romasheva, N. Energy resources exploitation in the russian arctic: Challenges and prospects for the sustainable development of the ecosystem / N. Romasheva, , D. Dmitrieva // Energies. – 2021. – Issue 62932, Vol. 14. – DOI: 10.3390/en14248300.
28. Rybak, J. Renewable-resource technologies in mining and metallurgical enterprises providing environmental safety / J. Rybak, A. Adigamov, C. Kongar-syuryun, M. Khayrutdinov, Y. Tyulyaeva // Minerals. – 2021. – V. 11–10. – 1145 p. – DOI: 10.3390/min11101145.
29. Tikhonova, S. A. Assessment of anthropogenic pollution of water bodies in Yakutia according to the spectral characteristics of satellite images / S. A. Tikhonova, G. P. Struchkova, T. A. Kapitonova // Mining Information and Analytical Bulletin, 2021. – 12-1, – P. 213–222. – DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2021_121_0_213.
30. WWF did not receive a response to its letters from NORNIKEL and urges the company for a quick response. – URL: https://wwf.ru/resources/news/zelenaya-ekonomika/wwf-ne-poluchil-ot-nornikelya-otveta-na-svoi-pisma-iprizyvaet-kompaniyu-k-operativnoy-reaktsii/ (accessed: 09.09.2022).
Review
For citations:
Ivanova T.S. ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY OF MINING COMPANIES IN THE ARCTIC. Arctic XXI Сentury. 2022;(3):5-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25587/SVFU.2022.30.74.001