In search for ‘erym’: views on leaders and leadership in rural communities of Chukotka

In social anthropology, the problem of leadership lies in the complexity of defining, analysing and studying this phenomenon in different societies, each understanding power  in  their  own  unique  way.  A  researcher’s  conception  of  ‘leadership’  and ‘leaders’ may not coincide with ethnographic reality and may hinder the search for leaders in local communities. This article proposes a method for finding leaders by studying perceptions of ‘erym’, which translates from the Chukot language as ‘chief’, ‘master’, ‘rapist’, or ‘strongest’. Based on field ethnographic material obtained in ten national villages in Chukotka, the article examines how residents of remote Arctic settlements assemble the image of a leader in their specific location, what criteria should be used to search for a leader in a settlement, and how the Chukchi language and beliefs system have influenced the contemporary understanding of what a modern leader is. We have identified two aspects which can be used to pinpoint a leader in a specific Chukotka community, namely, a person’s social position and qualities such as  strength  and  the  ability  to  command. We  have  arrived  at  the  conclusion  that  a person holding a leadership position in a village had already had certain leadership traits or had developed them in order to it the image of a ‘leader’ formed in that specific rural community. Local traits of a leader were expressed mainly through a description of a person’s activities, i.e. through certain actions that were important for that particular territory and community. The unchanging universal characteristics of a leader were strength (physical and psychological) and the ability to defend and exercise  violence.  Most  often,  when  searching  for  leaders,  these  characteristics have consistently produced results, leading to people who turned out to be the most important and influential in a specific community

1. Volkov VV, Kharkhordin OV. Theory of Practice. Saint Petersburg: EUSPb. 2008 (in Russian).

2. Ledyaev VG. Sociology of Power: Theory and Empirical Research of Power in Urban Communities. Moscow: Publishing house of the Higher School of Economics. 2012 (in Russian).

3. Bennis W, Nanus B. Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper & Row. 1985.

4. Istomin KV, Lyarskaya EV, Vasileva VV. Between the Emics and the Etics: Methodology for Studying Uncertainty in the Russian Arctic. Siberian Historical Research. 2025;(1):12–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/2312461X/47/2 (in Russian).

5. Ledyaev VG. Concepts of Power: An Analytical Review. A Reader on Political Anthropology: Power in Anthropological Discourse. Saint Petersburg: Publishing house of St. Petersburg University. 2006:82–102 (in Russian).

6. Burns J.M. Leadership. New York. 1978.

7. Alvesson M, Sveningsson S. The Great Disappearing Act: Dificulties in Doing ‘Leadership’. The Leadership Quarterly. 2003;14(3):359–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00031-6

8. Gemmill G, Oakley J. Leadership: an alienating social myth? Human Relations. 1992;45(2):113–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679204500201

9. Kelly S. Leadership: a category mistake? Human Relations. 2008;61(6):763-782.

10. Spoelstra S. Is leadership a visible phenomenon? On the (im)possibility of studying leadership. Management Concepts and Philosophy. 2013;7(3/4):174–188

11. Derrida J. The Gift of Death. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1995.

12. Dioneo – Shklovsky IV. In the extreme north-east of Siberia. Saint Petersburg. 1895 (in Russian).

13. Bogoraz VG. Luoravetlan-Russian (Chukchi-Russian) dictionary: with appendices of a brief outline of grammar. Moscow. 2011 (in Russian).

14. Maydel G. Travels through the north-eastern part of the Yakut region in 1868-1870. Saint Petersburg. 1894 (in Russian).

15. Moll TA, Inenlikey PI. Chukchi-Russian Dictionary. Saint Petersburg. 2005 (in Russian).

16. Mudrak OA. Etymological Dictionary of the Chukchi-Kamchatkan Languages. Moscow. 2000 (in Russian).

17. Bogoraz VG. Chukchi: Social Organization. Moscow. 2011 (in Russian).

18. Vdovin IS. Nature and man in the religious beliefs of the Chukchi. Nature and man in the religious beliefs of the peoples of Siberia and the North (second half of the 19th – early 20th century). Leningrad. 1976:217–253 (in Russian).

19. Davydova EA. Reindeer herders of Chukotka: power, kinship, relations with the state (based on materials from the 19th – mid-20th centuries). Saint Petersburg: MAE RAS. 2021 (in Russian).

20. Vensten Sh. Chukchi-French-English-Russian Dictionary. Vol. 3. Saint Petersburg. 2018 (in Russian).

21. Nizovtsev DB. The Problem of Power in the Works of Michel Foucault. Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University Series “Humanitarian and Social Sciences”. 2015;(4):49–57 (in Russian).

22. Zuev AS. The annexation of Chukotka to Russia (second half of the 17th – 18th century). Novosibirsk: SO RAN. 2009 (in Russian).

23. Davydova EA. Traditional leadership and state hierarchies in Chukotka during the Soviet and post-Soviet periods. Proceedings of the XXXI International Congress on Source Studies and Historiography of Asian and African Countries: Russia and the East. Vol. 2. Saint Petersburg: NP-Print. 2021 (in Russian).

24. Peoples of North-East Siberia / ed. Batyanova EP, Turaev VA. Moscow: Nauka. 2010 (in Russian).

25. Nefedkin AK. Prosopographia Tschukotica: Historical and bibliographical reference book of the inhabitants of Chukotka (mid-17th – irst quarter of the 20th century). Saint Petersburg. 2022 (in Russian).

26. Offermann LR, Kennedy JK, Wirtz PW. Implicit leadership theories: content, structure and generalizability. The Leadership Quarterly. 1994;5(1):43–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.003

27. Slezkin Yu. Arctic Mirrors: Russia and the Small Peoples of the North. Moscow: New Literary Review. 2008 (in Russian).

28. Volkov VN. The concept of “disciplinary power” in contemporary cultural studies discourse. Bulletin of the Kemerovo State University of Culture and Arts. 2012;19(2):10–17 (in Russian).

29. Luman N. Power and physical violence. Sociology of power. 2003;(3):127-146 (in Russian).

30. Zalysin IYu. Violence as a means of power: essence and political possibilities. In the context of Conlictology / ed. Dridze TM, Tsoy LN. Moscow: Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 1997. Available at: https://conlictmanagement.ru/nasilie-kak-sredstvo-vlasti-sushhnost-i-politicheskie-vozmozhnosti/ (date of access 17.10.2025) (in Russian).

31. Yarzutkina AA. “A stressful Business”: Alcohol Trading in Chukotka Villages. Anthropologicheskij Forum. 2022;(54):191–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31250/1815-8870-2022-18-54-191-224 (in Russian).

32. Bailey FG. Humbuggery and Manipulation: the art of leadership. Ithaca. New York: Cornell University Press. 1988.

33. Yarzoutkina A, Koulik N. «Ils boivent parce qu’ils n’ont pas d’argent, et ils n’ont pas d’argent, parce qu’ils boivent»: Relations à l’alcool et l’argent dans les villages de Tchoukotka. Études Inuit Studies. 2021;45(1–2):283–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1090319ar (in French).

34. Sewell Gr. Can a leader be authentic and cruel? What happens when a vice becomes a virtue. Leadership. 2024;20(6):382–401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150241283135

35. Fromm E. Psychoanalysis and religion. Twilight of the Gods / ed. Yakovleva AA. Moscow: Publishing house of political literature. 1990:143–221 (in Russian).

36. House RJ, Hanges PJ, Javidan M, Dorfman PW, Gupta V. Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. 2004.

37. Deacon R. From coninement to attachment: Michel Foucault on the rise of the school. The European Legacy: Toward New Paradigms. 2006;11(2):121–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770600587896

38. Ceven G, Korumaz M, Omur YE. Disciplinary Power in The School: Panoptic Surveillance. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research. 2021;16(1):153–171. DOI: https://doi.org/0.29329/epasr.2020.334.9