Motivational features of oikonyms in Yakutia and Canada: a comparative-typological study of common and specific characteristics
https://doi.org/10.25587/3034-7378-2026-14-2-86-117
Abstract
Abstract
This article presents a comparative analysis of motivational features of oikonyms (settlement names) in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) and three Canadian territories – the province of Alberta, the Northwest Territories, and the territory of Nunavut. The selection of these regions is justified by their climatic similarity, vast areas with low population density, and the presence of indigenous peoples with traditional subsistence economies. The study is based on an analysis of 36 oikonyms from Yakutia and 36 from Canada, employing descriptive, comparative-historical, etymological, and quantitative methods. The research examines both universal features shared by the oikonymic systems of both regions – such as multi-layered toponymic stratigraphy, toponymic irradiation, connection with geographical realities, and commemorativeness – as well as region-specific characteristics, including the predominance of indigenous linguistic strata in Yakutia and the active revitalization of native place names in Canada, ideologically marked Soviet oikonyms in Yakutia, and anthropotoponyms associated with the missionary and colonial history of Canada. Special attention is paid to the analysis of semantic groups of oikonyms reflecting physiographic characteristics, economic activities, and ethnocultural contacts. The cross-continental comparison of toponymic material reveals both deep universal patterns of naming and unique regional strategies of settlement designation, reflecting the ethnocultural history and the specific ways in which the peoples of the Arctic and the North have appropriated and conceptualized their spatial environment. The findings contribute to the development of comparative toponymics and linguoculturology, expanding the understanding of the mechanisms of toponymic nomination in polyethnic regions of the world. The study also demonstrates how historical and cultural processes, including colonization and decolonization, shape the toponymic landscape and influence the identity of local communities.
Keywords
About the Authors
M. V. SamsonovaRussian Federation
Marianna V. Samsonova – Cand. Sci. (Philology), Associate Professor, Institute of Modern Languages and International Studies,
Yakutsk
WoS ResearcherID: AAK-54152020;
Scopus Author ID: 57190953608;
Elibrary AuthorID: 429127.
G. S. Dorzhieva
Russian Federation
Galina S. Dorzhieva – Doct. Sci. (Philology), Professor,
Ulan-Ude.
Elibrary AuthorID: 313905.
J. Gao
China
Jianguo Gao – Cand. Sci. (Philology),
Beijing.
References
1. Dorzhieva GS. Aboriginal toponyms of Quebec. Ulan-Ude: Buryat State University Publishing House. 2010 (in Russian).
2. Podolskaya NV. Dictionary of Russian onomastic terminology. Moscow: Nauka. 1988 (in Russian).
3. Zavertkina EV. Oikonymy and its inherent features. Bulletin of Adyghe State University. Series 2: Philology and Art Studies. 2012;(1):179–183 (in Russian).
4. Burkova TA. Ideological oikodoublets in the history of an ethnosocium. Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series: Humanitarian and Social Sciences. 2023;23(6):45–54. https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V303 (in Russian).
5. Dambuev IA. Normalization of grammatical variants of toponyms: variation of generic endings. Russian Linguistic Bulletin. 2025;10(70):1–5. https://doi.org/10.60797/RULB.2025.70.9 (in Russian).
6. Aksholakova AZh. On grammatical adaptation of Kazakh toponyms. Bulletin KazNU. Philology Series. 2012;2(136):165–168 (in Russian).
7. Ganova SV. Conceptualization of oikonyms. The World of Science, Culture and Education. 2012;(1):362–365 (in Russian).
8. Khadieva GK, Galiullina GR. Structural and word-formation characteristics of Turkic-Tatar oikonyms of the Republic of Tatarstan. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki. 2013;155(5):179–185 (in Russian).
9. Dorzhieva GS, Shcherbakova AA. Onomasiology vs onomastics: problems of nomination: textbook. Ulan-Ude: Buryat State University Publishing House. 2019 (in Russian).
10. Zagryazkina TYu. Toponymic polyonymy through the prism of identity problems: Hexagone in the system of names of France. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. 2024;(3):9–26 (in Russian).
11. Superanskaya AV. Theory and methodology of onomastic studies. Moscow: Nauka. 1986 (in Russian).
12. Murzaev EM. Essays on toponymy. Moscow: Mysl. 1974 (in Russian).
13. Molodtsova VE. On the classification of Bashkir oikonyms. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Linguistics. 2014;(1):143–147 (in Russian).
14. Merzlyakova AV. Semantic features of French motivated toponyms: based on oikonyms. Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod. 2011;(6– 2):426–429 (in Russian).
15. Pechetova NYu, Nikaeva TM. Structural and word-formation models of Russian-language oikonyms of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). North-Eastern Journal of Humanities. 2023;2(43):78–88. https://doi.org/10.25693/SVGV.2023.43.2.006 (in Russian).
16. Samsonova LN. Russian and hybrid oikonyms of Yakutia. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. 2023;3(21):100–109 (in Russian).
17. Sychalina EV. Semantic adaptation of the German toponymic substrate in modern oikonymy of the Volga region. Philology. Theory & Practice. 2021;(8):2591– 2595 (in Russian).
18. Dorzhieva GS. Problems of toponymic synonymy in Quebec. Bulletin of Buryat State University. 2014;10–2:60–63 (in Russian).
19. Bukharova GKh. Reflection of Bashkir material culture in toponymy. Bulletin of Bashkir University. 2017;(4):1088–1094 (in Russian).
20. Afanasyeva AA. Evolution of the oikonymic system of Syamozerye. Proceedings of Petrozavodsk State University. 2020;(7):64–71 (in Russian).
21. Linko AV. Ancient toponyms of the Cilician plain of Greek-Latin origin. St. Tikhon’s University Review. Series 3: Philology. 2024;(80):76–86 (in Russian).
22. Shcherbak AS, Burykin AA. From the experience of studying areal characteristics of oikonyms with dialect bases in comparison with the areas of corresponding dialect lexical units. Tambov University Review. 2013;9(125):235– 242 (in Russian).
23. Burykin AA. On the problem of regional word-formation models in oikonymy: the area with conversional formation of oikonyms from church names. Philological Regional Studies. 2009;(1–2):69–73 (in Russian).
24. Timerkhanova NN, Kashin AA, Kudryavtsev AF. Oikonyms as a reflection of the place-development of the Udmurt ethnos. Yearbook of Finno-Ugric Studies. 2020;(1):45–54 (in Russian).
25. Ryzhenko AYu. Semic variation of oikonyms in modern regional press. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics. 2010;1–11:60-65 (in Russian).
26. Peteshova OV. The role of coordinated renamings in the formation of oikonymy of Kaliningrad Oblast. IKBFU’s Vestnik. Series: Philology, Pedagogy, Psychology. 2023;(2):36–42 (in Russian).
27. Tsvetkova EV. Motivation and non-motivation in toponymy: based on Kostroma toponymy. Vestnik of Kostroma State University. 2010;(2):202–206 (in Russian).
28. Syulbe Bagdaryyn. Toponymy of Yakutia: a brief popular science essay. Yakutsk: Bichik. 2004 (in Russian).
29. Nikaeva TM, Starostina AS, Tarabukina MV. Dictionary of toponyms of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia): settlements. Novosibirsk: Archimedes. 2022 (in Russian).
30. Samsonov NG. Our names. Yakutsk: Book Publishing House. 1989 (in Russian).
31. Bagdaryyn N. Syulbe Uola. Fishing vocabulary in the toponymy of the north-west of the Republic of Sakha. Philology. Theory & Practice. 2018;10– 1(88):45–52 (in Russian).
32. Bagdaryyn N. Syulbe Uola. From the toponymy of the north-west of the Republic of Sakha. Austrian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2015;(7– 8):95–100 (in Russian).
33. Kurilov YuG. Yukaghir toponyms of North-East Asia. Yakutsk: IHRISN SB RAS. 2013 (in Russian).
34. Keimetinov VA. Aboriginal (Even) toponymy of Yakutia: in 2 parts. Yakutsk: Yakut State University. 1996 (in Russian).
35. Vasilevich GM. Russian-Evenki dictionary: in 2 parts. Saint Petersburg: Prosveshchenie. 2005 (in Russian and Evenki).
36. Dorzhieva GS. Toponymy of Quebec as a reflection of the Francophone culture of the region: ethnolinguistic aspect. Abstract of Doctor’s dissertation (Philology). Moscow. 2011 (in Russian).
37. Dorzhieva GS. Toponymy of Quebec as a reflection of the Francophone culture of the region: ethnolinguistic aspect. Doctor’s dissertation (Philology). Moscow. 2012 (in Russian).
38. Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary / ed. VN. Yartseva. Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia. 1990 (in Russian).
39. Large explanatory dictionary of the Yakut language = Sakha tylyn byhaaryylaakh ulakhan tyldyta: in 15 vol. / ed. PA. Sleptsov. Novosibirsk: Nauka. 2004–2018 (in Yakut and Russian).
40. Starostin SA, Dybo AV, Mudrak OA. An Etymological Dictionary of Altaic Languages. Leiden; Boston: Brill. 2003.
41. Great Academic Mongolian-Russian Dictionary: in 4 vol. / ed. GTs. Pyurbeev. Moscow: Academia. 2001–2002 (in Mongolian and Russian).
42. Etymological dictionary of Mongolic languages: in 3 vol. / ed. GD. Sanzheev. Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies of the RAS. 2018 (in Russian).
43. Kuznetsov SA. Large explanatory dictionary of the Russian language. Saint Petersburg: Norint. 2000 (in Russian).
44. Kurilov GN. Yukaghir-Russian dictionary. Novosibirsk: Nauka. 2001 (in Russian).
45. Danilova NI, Popova NI. Landscape vocabulary in the Yakut language. North-Eastern Journal of Humanities. 2021;4(37):65–76. https://doi.org/10.25693/SVGV.2021.37.4.007 (in Russian).
46. Boldyrev BV. Evenki-Russian dictionary: in 2 parts. Novosibirsk: Publishing House of the Siberian Branch of the RAS, «Geo» branch. 2000 (in Evenki and Russian).
47. Ushnitsky VV. Tungus clans of Yakutia in the 17th century: issues of origin and ethnic affiliation. Bulletin of Archaeology, Anthropology and Ethnography. 2009;(9):124–129 (in Russian).
48. Leontiev VV, Novikova KA. Toponymic dictionary of the North-East of the USSR. Magadan: Book Publishing House. 1989 (in Russian).
49. Burykin AA. Foreign-language onomastics of Russian documents of the 17th–19th centuries relating to the discovery and exploration of Siberia and the Russian Far East as a historical source. Doctor’s dissertation (History). Saint Petersburg. 2011 (in Russian).
50. Kurilov NN. Yukaghir toponymy of the Nizhnekolymsky ulus of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). Yakutsk. 1999 (in Russian).
51. Pekarsky EK. Dictionary of the Yakut language: in 13 issues. Saint Petersburg; Petrograd; Leningrad: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences. 1907–1930 (in Russian).
52. Sevortyan EV. Etymological dictionary of Turkic languages: common Turkic and inter-Turkic stems beginning with vowels. Moscow: Nauka. 1974 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Samsonova M.V., Dorzhieva G.S., Gao J. Motivational features of oikonyms in Yakutia and Canada: a comparative-typological study of common and specific characteristics. Arctic XXI century. 2026;(2):86-117. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25587/3034-7378-2026-14-2-86-117
JATS XML











