The resources of ethnicity in the urban identity of Northerners

This article examines the formation of urban identity among residents of northern cities, analyzing the complex interplay of social, spatial, and linguistic factors in rapidly changing urban environments. Focusing on language dynamics under conditions of accelerated urbanization, the study explores how indigenous languages interact with dominant linguistic systems in Arctic urban centers. The research employs sociolinguistic surveys and in-depth autobiographical narratives to analyze original fieldwork data collected in 2023-2024 in Yakutsk and Mirny (Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)) and Anadyr (Chukotka Autonomous Okrug). Findings reveal urbanization’s dual nature as both a development catalyst and a challenge for northern indigenous communities, with assimilation processes threatening linguistic and cultural heritage while creating risks to ethnic identity preservation. The study demonstrates that linguistic comfort in major cities like Yakutsk correlates with socioeconomic factors, while in smaller centers like Anadyr and Mirny it is shaped by geographic conditions, social dynamics, and political-economic configurations. Notably, ethnocultural comfort manifests through demands for ethnicization of urban spaces, including integration of traditional elements in architecture and public events. In polyethnic cities like Mirny, key factors for ethno-linguistic comfort include compact urban morphology and opportunities for intercultural exchange. The research documents divergent attitudes toward interethnic interaction, underscoring the need for language policies that balance integration with preservation of ethnocultural diversity in transforming northern urban environments. 

1. Anisimov NO. Identity and the city. Nauka. Iskusstvo. Kul’tura. 2019;3(23):170-179 (in Russian).

2. Bogatova OV. Social identity of “cities of power” in modern Russia: basic sociological approaches. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Sociologija. Politologija. Mezhdunarodnye Otnoshenija. 2020;4(4):361-374 (in Russian).

3. Lefebvre A. The production of space. Moscow. 2015 (in Russian).

4. Turnbourn G. Globalization and inequality: problems of conceptualization and explanation. Sociologicheskie issledovanija. 2005;4(1):31-62 (in Russian).

5. Gornova GV. The structure of urban identity. Gumanitarnye issledovanija. 2018;3(20):14-16 (in Russian).

6. Dovbysh EG. Network technologies of urban identity formation. SouthRussian journal of social sciences. 2012;4:111-118 (in Russian).

7. Ivanova TV. Urban life as psychological experience: repetition of S. Milgram’s experiments in Samara. City. Culture. Education. Samara, PRO. 2001:69-89 (in Russian).

8. Miklyaeva AV, Rumyantseva PV. Urban identity of a resident of a modern megalopolis. A resource of personal well-being or a zone of increased risk? Moscow: Rech’. 2011 (in Russian).

9. Diagileva NS, Zhuravleva LA. Urban identity: concept, structure, fundamentals. Sociologija goroda. 2012; (1): 46-61 (in Russian).

10. Bokaev BN. Language as a factor of ethnic identity. Aktual’nye problemy gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk. 2011;(5):95-100 (in Russian).

11. Ozerina AA. Urban identity as a socio-psychological phenomenon. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 7, Filos. 2016;4(34):135-139 (in Russian).

12. Makhakova LS. Gender-specific identity with the city among young people. Psihologo-pedagogicheskij poisk. 2018;3 (47):162-167 (in Russian).

13. Vinokurova DM, Tomaska AG. Internal and external migration in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia): the attitude of the student youth. Vlast’ i upravlenie na Vostoke Rossii. 2021;1(94):177-187 (in Russian).